XTQZZZ's influence in the Spodek during IEM Katowice helped Vitality in winning the tournament

Which coaches are best after timeouts?

Find out who is most efficient in winning rounds after a pause.

Coaches are not allowed to communicate with players during a round, so aside from pre-game preparation, they can only affect a match during a timeout.

It is often thought that the coach will come in with a play call or an adjustment to convert the next round and take momentum in their side's favor.

So, which coaches are the best at winning a round directly after calling a pause? CS Stats BR published their findings on X, which are based on the post-timeout stats from IEM Katowice and BLAST Bounty Season 1.

Remy "XTQZZZ" Quoniam from Vitality and Sergey "Hally" Shavaev from Spirit took the top two spots with 58% and 57% conversion rates, respectively, while Vitality won Katowice and Spirit won BLAST Bounty.

Of the 25 teams who played at least 100 rounds across both events, only seven coaches registered 50% or greater win rates after a timeout. While timeouts are the coach's best time to influence a game, they often call a pause when the momentum is going in the other team's direction. This points to an inherent difficulty in winning rounds after a tactical pause, which makes the top performers' numbers all the more impressive.

Also read

#1(With 2 replies)
February 13, 2025 02:08PM
Will
only dust2.us would write an article about a tweet that’s entirely inaccurate and misleading
#2(With 1 replies)
February 13, 2025 02:17PM
Mnmzzz
Care to expand on that?
#3(With 0 replies)
February 13, 2025 05:46PM
Will
the data isn’t normalized to the teams typical round win rate, so the data isn’t actually really indicative of anything and you can’t draw any conclusions from it
You must be logged in to add a comment.